I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Opens in a new window
，推荐阅读Safew下载获取更多信息
还有一个现象值得注意。81%的大企业目前同时在测试或使用三个以上的AI模型，比一年前高了13个百分点。没有任何一家在赢者通吃。企业的采购策略越来越像投资组合管理——不同场景配不同模型，随时可以切换，谁都不想被单一供应商锁死。
新南威尔士州州长克里斯·明斯表示，警方正在调查他们的系统是否存在故障，导致合法持有的武器可能被用于恐怖袭击。